Saturday, March 9, 2013

ICT as an Enabling Technology

This post provides an overview of how ICT enables savings of greenhouse gas emissions in society. Therefore an interactive mind map is presented, which relates and describes the common terms and concepts in this context. The branches of the mind map define the highest-level entities of a classification structure for approaches and applications of ICT for a Low Carbon Society. This structure has two dimensions: The main principles (optimization and dematerialization) and the application areas (public and economic sectors).

Explore the Mind Map to learn about ICT as an Enabling Technology


The central entity of the diagram reflects the central role of ICT as Enabling Technology in the whole context of achieving sustainability improvements by using ICT systems. The ICT sector as well as other sectors are the key players in this system. Every economic sector has a carbon footprint that is used as a measure of sustainability and can therefore be used to benchmark the progress of reaching the environmental goals. The enabling effect of ICT is based on the capability to optimize and dematerialize, which leads whether directly, or as a side-effect of energy efficiency, to emissions savings. Energy efficiency and emissions savings contribute to sustainability by reduced resource consumption and a lower greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere. Also the rebound effect has to be kept in mind, which is an implication of energy efficiency and partly offsets the emissions savings achieved by efficiency improvements. The aim of reaching sustainability exists in respect to the ongoing Climate Change, which is accelerated by greenhouse gas emissions.

Classification of ICT for a Low Carbon Society

Explore the Mind Map to learn about ICT for a Low Carbon Society!



The presented classification structure has two dimensions or points of view to categorize the approaches. On the one hand every approach can be assigned to a main principle of how it can contribute to a low carbon economy. Such a contribution needs concepts for the reduction of energy usage and emissions. There are two main concepts that could be identified by looking at state of the art approaches. On the one hand emissions can be directly avoided by "dematerialization". In this context dematerialization is the substitution of physical products or routes of transportation by its digital equivalent. For example, letters can be replaced by electronic mail and video conferences can be held instead of physical meetings.
On the other hand products and processes can be optimized in order to save energy and reduce emissions. Therefore the taxon optimization refers to the improvement of processes and facilities regarding to energy consumption. Current approaches try to obtain this optimization by increased efficiency of units or systems (e.g. Thin Clients), or a higher grade of automation (e.g. lighting) and optimized coordination (e.g. logistics) in processes.
The second dimension of this classification is a somehow natural categorization of the approaches, since reductions in emissions can only be achieved in areas where energy is consumed and emissions arise. These areas are defined as application areas of the current approaches in using ICT to reduce emissions and mainly represent economic sectors. The taxa in the application area dimension are the energy use in buildings, the transportation of passengers and goods, the energy supply industry, the industry and business sector, the public sector and the ICT sector.

Main Principle Dimension

There are two concepts that differentiate the approaches in the highest level of the main principle dimension. On the one hand there is dematerialization, as Information Technology has the ability to replace physical objects and processes. On the other hand, energy savings can be achieved by optimization, which constitutes the second main principle. For each of these main principles the object of application can be distinguished. This means that the concept of dematerialization as well as the concept of optimization can be applied to either a physical object, which can be a product or a production unit, or to a process, like a production process or the process of traveling. In case of the optimization of processes approaches differ once more, since some are based on automation and others on improved coordination.

Dematerialization 

One important feature of ICT regarding to sustainable development is dematerialization. The SMART 2020 report published by The Climate Group in 2008 postulates a “strong emphasis on the significant opportunities offered by dematerialisation” and states in this context: “Our study indicates that using technology to dematerialise the way we work and operate across public and private sectors could deliver a reduction of 500 MtCO2e in 2020 - the equivalent of the total ICT footprint in 2002, or just under the emissions of the UK in 2007.” [1] A graphical illustration of this estimation is given in figure 1.
This indicates that the potential of emissions savings through dematerialization is estimated to be quite large. It could also be a main concept to arrange further growth and development with a lower intensity of environmental impact. This implies a higher level of efficiency achieved by learning by experience and a declining consumption of goods and energy because of dematerialization [2].

When dealing with dematerialization enabled by ICT, it has to be distinguished between products and routes of transport, although the borders between these categories are not completely sharp. For example the e-initiatives of governments (e-government) could be classified by both taxa, because they dematerialize the use of paper, as well as routes of transport, since citizens save travel ways to governmental departments by using online services. In this taxonomy the approach of the e-government is classified as dematerializing routes of transport, because the paperless office is considered as a separate concept, which is obviously a product-dematerializing concept.

Although the ability to replace physical products and processes is assumed to be one of the big environmental benefits of ICT, there is some kind of uncertainty regarding to the real potential of dematerialization in the future. The success of every kind of technology strongly depends on adoption, which cannot be predicted in preposition [1]. As an example, the idea of the paperless office goes back to the age of early personal computers in the 1970’s [3], but its distribution is still in development due to difficulties in adoption. With the introduction of electronic mail the usage of paper was expected to decline, but users tended to print their mails at the office, so that paper consumption actually increased [4]. Therefore the future impact of dematerialization will among other things depend on the inertia of consumer habits and the incentives for adoption for businesses.


Figure 1: The potential impact of dematerialization [1]

Optimization 

The second main principle of approaches that use ICT to enable emissions savings is optimization, which is a very general term that leaves room for interpretation. To clarify this term, optimization makes things more efficient regarding to energy consumption or the usage of other resources. In opposition to the concept of dematerialization, the focus of the principle of optimization is not the replacement of things by ICT. In this case, ICT enables improvements in energy consumption and emissions reductions by making units or processes more efficient. Therefore, in the taxonomy the optimization potential of ICT is split up into unit efficiency and the optimization of processes. The first taxon groups together approaches which improve the energy efficiency of machines, production units, devices or any other physical object. Process optimization is divided into two main concepts, where automation is one and coordination the other. Automation makes use of technology to execute tasks without the need for manpower. Alongside production processes this principle is also used in lighting systems in buildings for example. The taxon coordination stands for improved coordination of processes and work flows by using information and communication technology. This involves computer applications used to optimize transport routes, as well as smart grids developed to coordinate energy supply more efficiently. Optimization can also be considered as making things smart, as ICT enables to build smart motor systems and to improve energy efficiency in buildings and transport by smart buildings and smart logistics [1]. One the one hand the term smart stands for a kind of intelligence that inheres these improved units or processes, on the other hand The Climate Group defines the actions the ICT sector can take to improve the global emissions situation by the five letters of SMART [5]:
  • Standardization of how energy consumption and information about emissions can be traced and made accessible throughout different processes in economy. 
  • Monitoring of energy consumption and emissions in real time. 
  • Accountability for energy consumption and emissions should be established beside other business priorities. This can be achieved by the application of network tools. 
  • Rethinking about how we should live, learn, play and work in a low carbon society, enabled by ICT as an information platform, which can also help working together to gain efficiency improvements. 
  • Transformation of the economy will happen if the enabling effect of ICT can be turned to account. 

This assessment of The Climate Group concerning the optimization potential of ICT suggests that Information Technology can support and enable a transformation process to a low carbon economy and society in a great extent. But this implies the acceptance and commitment of other economic sectors and governments.

 

Application Area Dimension

The application areas where ICT is used to achieve improvements in energy efficiency or emissions savings mainly correspond to the economic sectors with the highest energy demand. The results of the classification show, that there are various approaches that make use of information and communication technologies to affect energy efficiency and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions in nearly every economic sector. This fact postulates once more the role of ICT as enabling technology for energy and emissions savings, as it can be found in literature [6, 1]. On the other hand there are also some approaches concerning energy savings in the ICT sector, which can directly contribute to decrease greenhouse gas emissions by making ICT systems more energy efficient. But these concepts, summarized as Green IT, also strengthen the enabling effect of ICT.
The presented classification of the application area dimension highlights that the general concepts defined in the main principle dimension can be applied in many different areas. For example, the concept of dematerialization is applied to transport, business and public sector, as ICT can substitute transport routes and products in each of these areas.

Approximations of the possible ICT-enabled emissions savings in all other economic sector are quantified by 7,8 GtCO2e by 2020, when assuming total emissions of 51,9 GtCO2e [1]. For this estimation the SMART 2020 Report considers four general application areas: Industry, Transport, Buildings and Power (cf. figure 2). For each of these areas ICT brings so called “SMART opportunities”, in form of “Smart motors and industrial processes”, “Smart logistics”, “Smart buildings” and “Smart grids” [1]. The concept of dematerialization provides benefits for all areas except of the power sector. There is one difference between the results of this observation by The Climate Group and the conclusion of this thesis. The taxonomy of this thesis defines the public sector as separate application area for ICT approaches, whereas in figure 2 this is considered as part of dematerialization opportunities in other sectors. In fact, there are governmental initiatives like e-government or e-health that are initiated by the public sector and therefore have to be classified in this context.


Figure 2: The enabling effect of ICT estimated by The Climate Group [1]

References

[1] The Climate Group. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[2] J.H. Ausubel and P.E. Waggoner. Dematerialization: Variety, caution, and persistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 105 no. 35:12774–12779, 2008.

[3] Business Week. The   office   of   the   future. Business Week, June 1975. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2008/tc20080526_547942.htm. Accessed: 2013-03-09.

[4] A. J. Sellen and R. H. R. Harper. The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, 2003.

[5] The Climate Group. Smart 2020 report summary. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[6] G. Philipson. ICT’s role in the low carbon economy. Technical report, Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA), 2010.

Optimization

Explore the Mind Map to learn about Optimization!

The second main principle of approaches that use ICT to enable emissions savings is optimization, which is a very general term that leaves room for interpretation. To clarify this term, optimization makes things more efficient regarding to energy consumption or the usage of other resources. In opposition to the concept of dematerialization, the focus of the principle of optimization is not the replacement of things by ICT. In this case, ICT enables improvements in energy consumption and emissions reductions by making units or processes more efficient. Therefore, in the taxonomy the optimization potential of ICT is split up into unit efficiency and the optimization of processes. The first taxon groups together approaches which improve the energy efficiency of machines, production units, devices or any other physical object. Process optimization is divided into two main concepts, where automation is one and coordination the other. Automation makes use of technology to execute tasks without the need for manpower. Alongside production processes this principle is also used in lighting systems in buildings for example. The taxon coordination stands for improved coordination of processes and work flows by using information and communication technology. This involves computer applications used to optimize transport routes, as well as smart grids developed to coordinate energy supply more efficiently.

Optimization can also be considered as making things smart, as ICT enables to build smart motor systems and to improve energy efficiency in buildings and transport by smart buildings and smart logistics [1]. One the one hand the term smart stands for a kind of intelligence that inheres these improved units or processes, on the other hand The Climate Group defines the actions the ICT sector can take to improve the global emissions situation by the five letters of SMART [2]:
  • Standardization of how energy consumption and information about emissions can be traced and made accessible throughout different processes in economy. 
  • Monitoring of energy consumption and emissions in real time. 
  • Accountability for energy consumption and emissions should be established beside other business priorities. This can be achieved by the application of network tools. 
  • Rethinking about how we should live, learn, play and work in a low carbon society, enabled by ICT as an information platform, which can also help working together to gain efficiency improvements. 
  • Transformation of the economy will happen if the enabling effect of ICT can be turned to account. 

This assessment of The Climate Group concerning the optimization potential of ICT suggests that Information Technology can support and enable a transformation process to a low carbon economy and society in a great extent. But this implies the acceptance and commitment of other economic sectors and governments.

References

[1] The Climate Group. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[2] The Climate Group. Smart 2020 report summary. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

Dematerialization

Explore the Mind Map to learn about Dematerialization!

One important feature of ICT regarding to sustainable development is dematerialization. The SMART 2020 report published by The Climate Group in 2008 postulates a “strong emphasis on the significant opportunities offered by dematerialisation” and states in this context: “Our study indicates that using technology to dematerialise the way we work and operate across public and private sectors could deliver a reduction of 500 MtCO2e in 2020 - the equivalent of the total ICT footprint in 2002, or just under the emissions of the UK in 2007.” [1] A graphical illustration of this estimation is given in figure 4.2.
This indicates that the potential of emissions savings through dematerialization is estimated to be quite large. It could also be a main concept to arrange further growth and development with a lower intensity of environmental impact. This implies a higher level of efficiency achieved by learning by experience and a declining consumption of goods and energy because of dematerialization [2].


Figure 4.2: The potential impact of dematerialization [1] 

When dealing with dematerialization enabled by ICT, it has to be distinguished between products and routes of transport, although the borders between these categories are not completely sharp. For example the e-initiatives of governments (e-government) could be classified by both taxa, because they dematerialize the use of paper, as well as routes of transport, since citizens save travel ways to governmental departments by using online services. In this taxonomy the approach of the e-government is classified as dematerializing routes of transport, because the paperless office is considered as a separate concept, which is obviously a product-dematerializing concept.

Although the ability to replace physical products and processes is assumed to be one of the big environmental benefits of ICT, there is some kind of uncertainty regarding to the real potential of dematerialization in the future. The success of every kind of technology strongly depends on adoption, which cannot be predicted in preposition [1]. As an example, the idea of the paperless office goes back to the age of early personal computers in the 1970’s [3], but its distribution is still in development due to difficulties in adoption. With the introduction of electronic mail the usage of paper was expected to decline, but users tended to print their mails at the office, so that paper consumption actually increased [4]. Therefore the future impact of dematerialization will among other things depend on the inertia of consumer habits and the incentives for adoption for businesses.

References

[1] The Climate Group. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[2] J.H. Ausubel and P.E. Waggoner. Dematerialization: Variety, caution, and persistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 105 no. 35:12774–12779, 2008.

[3] Business Week. The office of the future. Business Week, June 1975.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2008/tc20080526_547942.htm 

Accessed: 2013-02-12.

[4] A. J. Sellen and R. H. R. Harper. The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, 2003.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Buildings

Explore the Mind Map to learn about the sustainable use of ICT in the Buildings Sector!



In Europe 40% of total energy is used in buildings [1], in China it can be numbered as one third [2]. Because of the high energy demand for heating, cooling, ventilation and lighting in buildings there are many approaches to reduce the energy usage by better insulation and more efficient systems on the one hand, and to make buildings self-supporting in terms of energy supply on the other hand. The potential for energy and emissions savings by improvements in this sector can be considered as large. A recent study in the UK showed that a single domestic property fitted with photovoltaics saved about 1 tonne of CO2 emissions in one year [3]. There are many different options to reduce energy demand in buildings, which refer to directly reducing demand by more efficient systems and insulation, as well as integrating small-scale power generators, which make use of renewable energy sources. To summarize these actions in one term, it is all about improving building design. ICT is the dominating technology to enable such improvements in buildings. Gains in energy efficiency enabled by ICT can mainly be achieved by automation. Therefore systems are developed for automated management and control of lighting, heating, ventilation and air conditioning. To make use of building integrated energy generators, like photovoltaics or wind turbines, ICT systems are needed too. There are already a few projects integrating wind turbines in buildings to provide them with clean and renewable energy [2]. In this context information technology is used to manage the needed electricity grids, that can deal with the varying work load of wind turbines. This implicates the storage of electricity in times when more power is generated than used, as well as managing additional sources of energy when the work load of the wind turbine is too low to meet total demand.
In terms of approaches in reducing emissions, buildings will be closely linked to the power supply sector in future. This is because of the distribution of Smart Grids, that allow buildings to become power supplying units. The are concepts in development, that force electricity generators integrated in buildings as local power stations for electric vehicles [4]. Concepts like these link the buildings sector to the transport sector, mainly to individual transport, as well. This shows the future importance of new approaches in the buildings sector.
The leading term for ICT supported management of buildings is Computer Aided Facility Management (CAFM) [5]. This involves the management, control and maintenance of buildings and its systems. It is the integration of different systems for heating, ventilation, cooling, lighting and small-scale power generators that characterizes the role of ICT in improving building design. An important issue of this integration are open standards, that enable interoperability of different technologies and the usage of new systems in existing buildings [6]. Beside utilization and maintenance of buildings, the advantages of ICT systems can be useful in design, construction and demolition phase too [4]. To reach the whole potential of energy efficiency in buildings, optimization of all phases in a building’s life cycle is necessary. For example there are Building Information Management (BIM) systems [7], that provide architects and engineers with necessary information in design and construction phase, which leads to optimized building design. These systems also enable the automation of design processes, resulting in shorter development times. The advantages of BIM systems can be accounted by energy assessments, improved documentation, air-flow simulations and cost analysis for example. ICT solutions for the use in operational phase of buildings are called Building Management Systems (BMS) [7]. These applications provide functionalities for the automation of monitoring and control of room conditioning and security systems.
The role of ICT for energy savings in buildings as stated by the SMART 2020 Report is as follows [4]:
  • Standardize, monitor and account: ICT systems can be used to adapt local heating, ventilation and lighting to the needs of occupants, without wasting resources. Furthermore modeling and simulating energy usage scenarios in buildings and benchmarking of building performance is enabled. The establishment of standards for technology compatibility and benchmark comparison would ease efficiency gains. Improvements in building design can be achieved by networks for remote monitoring and management of building systems and automation solutions, based on energy efficient hardware. 
  • Rethink: The inefficiencies of building management systems can be found and improved by the use of ICT. Also the involvement and engagement of users has to be extended to reach an optimum in energy usage. Information plays a major role in this adoption process towards a low carbon economy. 
  • Transform: The vision of future building design involves buildings which are adjustable to user preferences. Therefore improved user interfaces are needed. To make building usage more efficient technologies for teleworking and collaboration have to be improved. Future buildings should be equipped with local energy supply (e.g. photovoltaics) and systems for automated control, diagnosis and maintenance. 
There are estimations that the total emissions arising from building sector will reach 11.7 GtCO2e in 2020. The Smart 2020 Report states that improved building design and the use of automation technology could save 1.68 GtCO2e globally [4]. Other sources expect that the building sector would be able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 30-35 percent by 2050, in spite of growing numbers of buildings, by tapping the full potential of today’s technology [7]. Basically there are two types of improving building design. The first possibility is to equip new buildings with modern building management systems in construction phase. The systems are already considered in design phase, which makes optimization easier in comparison to integrating such systems in existing building, which is the second type of improvement. To reach the amount of emissions saving that is needed to successfully address the climate problem, both types of improved building design have to be realized. Equipping existing buildings with modern technologies globally is a large-scale project, but the energy saving potential is large. The retrofitting of existing buildings is a major part of the possibility supplied by ICT to reduce the carbon footprint of the building sector [6], since 80 percent of the existing building stock is more than 10 years old [7].
Complying to the three dimensions of sustainability the net benefit of ICT enabled improved building design has economic, environmental and social aspects [7]:
  • Economic benefit – Reduced operating costs of facilities, due to lower energy consumption in design, utilization and maintenance. – Investments in the economy, in form of retrofitting activities and development of innovative building design to meet new standards and requirements. 
  • Environmental benefit – An estimation of 33.5 million tons of CO2 savings per year. 
  • Social benefit – Creation of jobs in design and construction of buildings for retrofitting and design improvements. 
Although large energy savings can be expected from improvements in building design, commissioning, utilization, operation and maintenance, there are some hurdles to adopt these technologies. There is a lack of incentives for building designers and architects to integrate energy saving technology into buildings, since the payback periods are often long [4]. Therefore it is up to governments to provide such incentives, for example by tax deductions for reaching certified performance levels of energy efficiency in buildings [7]. The need to measure efficiency levels of buildings is one part of the importance of establishing standards for building technologies. There have to be standards in rating systems and valuation tools for buildings [4], as well as standards for the interoperability of building integrated technologies. Standardization is one of the benefits ICT can offer to other sectors. It is one of the reasons for the success of the ICT sector, that it established international standards for communication and information exchange [6]. The success of reducing energy demand and emissions in the building sector will depend on the agreement on standards for system design and monitoring. Standards can be seen as a basis for achieving potential efficiency gains [6], because of their characteristic to offer interoperability and comparability.

References

[1] W. Zeiler, R. Houten, G.t Boxem, P. Savanovic, J. Velden, W. Wortel, J.-F. Haan, R. Kamphuis, and H. Broekhuizen. Design ontology for comfort systems and energy infrastructures: Flexergy.  In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 49–58. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[2] B. Cai and H. Jin.  Development and strategies of building integrated wind turbines in china. In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 71–78. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[3] F. J. O’Flaherty, J. A. Pinder, and C. Jackson. The role of photovoltaics in reducing carbon emissions in domestic properties. In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 107–115. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[4] The Climate Group. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[5] International Facility Management Association (IFMA). Glossary of facility management
terms. http://fmpedia.org/. Accessed: 2011-11-07.


[6] B. Tomlinson. Greening through IT - Information Technology for Environmental Sustainability. The MIT Press, 2010.

[7] G. Philipson. Ict’s role in the low carbon economy. Technical report, Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA), 2010.


Intelligent Building Systems - Lighting Automation - HVAC Automation

Intelligent Building Systems

The term Intelligent Building System refers to the integration of various building facilities by computer systems. Such a system provides a centralized control application for example for HVAC (heat, ventilation and air conditioning), security systems, lighting systems, energy management, access control and telecommunications [1]. In other words, Intelligent Building Systems try to integrate several building automation systems. As mentioned before, these systems are developed to control innovative technologies to increase energy efficiency as well as user benefits. Approaches of this kind address the fundamental issue of achieving reductions in energy demand in buildings without lowering the quality of in-building conditions for occupants. This is of special importance for the distribution of energy efficient technology, since it can also bring direct benefits for users, beside the positive environmental impact. To reduce energy consumption in buildings Intelligent Software Agents (ISA) can be installed at different levels of automation. The focus of this approach is set on individual climate control to adjust the conditions to user preferences by an optimal setting of parameters. This implies profound knowledge of the actual weather situation and data about the building like window orientations. An approach of this kind was tested in field in office buildings in the Netherlands [2]. Although this technology is still in research phase, it is a promising concept to deal with the trade-off between energy savings and individual comfort.

Lighting automation 

Lighting is responsible for about 20 percent of total energy demand in commercial buildings and for about 10 percent of energy demand in residential homes [3]. One possibility to reduce this energy consumption is to use more efficient illuminants, like light-emitting diodes (LED). On the other hand the inefficiencies in lighting of today’s buildings arise from light usage. Light should be turned on when it’s needed and should be turned off when it’s not necessarily needed. This approach can be named as occupancy-based lighting [4]. At this point automated lighting systems come to play. Modern lighting control systems are computer systems that allow automated control and optimization of lighting in office or private buildings, that maximize efficiency and therefore save energy. The energy savings from these control systems can be numbered as up to 70 percent of today’s energy demand for lighting [5]. The global potential of emissions savings by lighting automation is estimated by about 0.12 GtCO2e [4], which would bring a significant environmental benefit. Additionally there are important social and economic benefits, like improved and individually adjusted room lighting and lower operational costs due to lower energy consumption.
Typical features of modern lighting control systems are the following [5, 6]:
  • Direct on/off and dimming controls provided to the occupants at a centralized control user interface. 
  • Possibility of remote management of lighting control of all individual lights in a whole building or several buildings combined. 
  • Scheduling functions and timers, switching lights on and off or dimming lights automatically at predefined times. 
  • Integration of photo-sensors to detect illumination levels of natural lighting. This allows to adjust additional artificial lighting efficiently to meet the required illumination levels and save a significant amount of energy. 
  • Occupancy sensors, to enable occupancy-based lighting, especially useful in areas with varying usage. 
  • Functions for measuring and monitoring energy consumption of lighting, which provide real-time or historical data on energy usage for decision making. 
As already mentioned lighting control systems can not only provide energy savings, they can also bring advancements in lighting characteristics like illumination levels in respect to the requirements at different places. As an example, lighting can be individually adjusted to several specific workplaces in the same room. Beside environmental benefits, this induces significant economic and social improvements, since it is the sense of artificial lighting to improve the productivity and wellbeing of a buildings occupants. To achieve individuality in lighting and to adjust it to user preferences, a flexible structure of the lighting network is needed. This involves a multiple-circuits configuration with local and remote control functions and individually positioned luminaries at specific areas per room [7]. Approaches like this focus at ensuring that savings in energy are not achieved at the cost of performance. However a simple case study at a small office showed, that automated lighting control could lower energy usage to about 30 or 40 percent of energy usage without any lighting control facilities [7].
One problem for adoption of lighting control systems in existing buildings are the high costs of installation and rewiring [8]. Wireless technology could help overcome this hurdle, since it is better compatible with economic considerations due to lower investment expenses for retrofitting. In the case of wireless lighting control a network of wireless photo- and occupancy sensors, as well as wireless light switches and dimmers is installed, which means that “each endpoint is wirelessly enabled” [5]. Figure 1 shows a schema of a simple wireless lighting architecture, using wireless actuation modules for luminaries with dimming functions and a base server for lighting control. The system is designed as wireless networked intelligent lighting actuation system, to gain energy savings and satisfy the needs of individual occupants [8].


Figure 1: Wireless networked lighting architecture [8]

More complex wireless lighting networks use mesh-architectures, meaning that every endpoint can communicate with the controller by at least two channels, which makes the network more stable and more resistant to failures due to redundancy [5]. Beside the relatively low costs of retrofits, the major benefits of wireless lighting control are flexibility in placing lighting controls and reconfigurations of the network, as well as high scalability in respect of adding devices and expanding the network.

Heat, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) automation 

Similar to lighting control, heating, ventilation and air conditioning can also be automated by special building automation system (BAS). In this case the BAS is a computer network integrating the controls of heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems of buildings, which also can be automated [6]. A main goal of these systems is to adjust HVAC settings to occupants needs in order to save energy and improve room conditions. In China HVAC systems are responsible for more than 70 percent of total energy use in buildings [9]. Globally the automation of HVAC systems could save up to 0.13 GtCO2e [4].
The full potential of energy savings from improving HVAC systems in the building sector can be tapped by developing hybrid systems for heating and cooling that use efficient and low carbon energy sources. An example of a hybrid air conditioning system is a combination of a vapor-compression system, a desiccant dehumidification system and a indirect evaporative cooling system [9]. To achieve maximum efficiency of such combined systems information technology is needed to optimize and operate them. For proper and efficient building ventilation there are hybrid concepts too. These systems use a combination of natural ventilation and air conditioning [10].
Another approach of reducing energy demand for heating and cooling is to exploit geothermal energy. This brings significant environmental benefits, since this type of energy is carbonfree and widely available. The main principle of these systems is the heat pump, which works like a “reverse refrigerator” [11]. The ground heat is used for building heating in winter, since the soil is warm relatively to the air on the surface. In summer the soil can be used to cool the building by reversing this principle. Figure 2 depicts a simple schema of a heat pump system.


Figure 2: Ground source heat pump system for building heating and cooling [11]

Geothermal systems are often used in context of passive building concepts with a low grade of natural ventilation. These concepts often optimize energy consumption at the cost of room conditions. To improve room conditions, additional active ventilation systems are necessary, to achieve the required level of air exchange in these buildings. In contrast to this, there are approaches in research to use geothermal energy with the help of ground air collectors to realize active conditioning systems. The advantage of this method is, that the whole building construction is warmed by naturally preheated air in winter and cooled by natural cool air in summer [12]. The principle is similar to traditional heat pumps, but the main difference is that air is used to heat or cool the building instead of water. By collecting ground air a higher level of ventilation can be achieved to improve room conditions and the need for additional ventilation can be avoided.
Heating of buildings by traditional systems using fossil fuels has large environmental impact. In the UK tempering buildings accounts for about 49 percent of total carbon emissions [13]. There are several technology approaches for low carbon domestic and nondomestic heating, to lower this environmental impact. Such heating systems are called microgeneration heat technology, since they are built in small-scale factor and mainly used to heat single building units [13]. Some samples for microgeneration heat technology used for room and water heating are heat pumps, solar thermal hot water, biomass stoves and boilers fuelled by wood or pellets. Just as for other building technologies the role of ICT is to control these microgeneration heat systems, integrate them with other building automation systems and therefore optimize the efficiency.
A study from the UK about the use and adoption of low carbon microgeneration technology addressed the reasons for or against the adoption of these technologies [13]. The survey showed that a big part of the adopters of microgeneration heat technologies considered themselves as “environmentally conscious” and took also different actions to reduce their energy demand, like using public transport for example. Households in rural areas, with no children, or where children already left home, are more likely to adopt low carbon technology as well. The main reason for adoption is the idea to lower bills and carbon emissions. On the other hand, the largest barriers for adoption are mainly financial: high initial costs, uncertain and long payback periods, small subsidies [13]. In summary there are financial, regional and ideological factors that influence the decision for or against adopting new technology to lower the environmental impact of domestic heating systems. The uncertainty about payback periods and efficiency of these systems that prevents many households from adoption. Therefore a well-directed information campaign and higher incentives given by governments could help overcome these barriers and support a faster distribution of low carbon heating technologies.

References

[1] Diamond Electronic Systems Ltd. http://www.diamondsystems.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=81&Itemid=84. Accessed: 2013-03-08.

[2] W. Zeiler, R. Houten, and G. Boxem.  Smart buildings:  Intelligent software agents.  In
Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy
and Buildings, pages 9–17. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.


[3] B. Metz. Controlling climate change. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[4] The Climate Group. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical report, The Climate Group on behalf of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008.

[5] Daintree  Networks,   Inc.      White  paper:    The  value  of  wireless  lighting  control.
http://www.daintree.net/downloads/whitepapers/smart-lighting.pdf.  Accessed: 2013-03-08.


[6] R. Wolsey.  Controlling lighting with building automation systems.  Lighting Answers, Vol. 4 Number 1:1 – 8, May 1997.

[7] G. Parise and L. Martirano.  Impact of building automation, controls and building management on energy performance of lighting systems.  In Industrial Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference - Conference Record 2009 IEEE, pages 1 –5, May 2009.

[8] Y.-J. Wen and A.M. Agogino. Wireless networked lighting systems for optimizing energy savings and user satisfaction. In Wireless Hive Networks Conference, 2008. WHNC 2008. IEEE, pages 1 –7, Aug. 2008.

[9] K. Sumathy, Li Yong, Y. J. Dai, and R. Z. Wang.   Study on a novel hybrid desiccant dehumidification and air conditioning system. In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 413–421. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[10] A. Elmualim. Integrated building management systems for sustainable technologies: Design aspiration and operational shortcoming. In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 275–280. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[11] B. Metz. Controlling climate change. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[12] W. Zeiler and G. Boxem. Geothermal active building concept. In Robert J. Howlett, Lakhmi C. Jain, and Shaun H. Lee, editors, Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, pages 305–314. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

[13] S. Caird and R. Roy. Adoption and use of household microgeneration heat technologies. Low Carbon Economy, 1(2):61–70, December 2010.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Industry & Business

Explore the Mind Map to learn about the sustainable use of ICT in Industry & Business!

Ever since the development of ICT industry and business have been major application areas for these technologies. Their distribution brought significant changes for these sectors by revolutionizing production and trading methods. Information and communication networks offer channels for the exchange of business data, for cooperation and distribution, whereas computer systems enable optimization of a broad range of industrial and business processes, resulting in efficiency gains in energy and resource usage. Whether ICT can contribute to reduce carbon emissions arising from industry and business is discussed in this section. Given that the focus of industry and business is always set on economic growth, it is a great issue of sustainability to align this economic objective with the currently urgent environmental and social aspects on the way to a low carbon society. Therefore it is necessary to find methods of sustainable growth, meaning “to preserve the same outputs, in terms of functionality to people, with less resource use”, for which developments in technology can account.